Editorial Notebook

The art of diplomacy

Diplomacy is a delicate art. Contrary to the now popular belief, it is not a weakness but the advantage of foresight. It is the heart of international relations and the soul of negotiation. However, its essence extends far beyond politics and world affairs. At its core, diplomacy is the practice of tact and strategic communication; an art that fosters understanding, minimizes conflict, and seeks mutually beneficial solutions. Aurea mediocritas, the golden mean, the sweet spot where all involved parties can benefit from effective problem-solving.

In everyday interactions, diplomacy plays a crucial role in maintaining harmony and resolving conflict with your peers and the people around you. Whether resolving disputes for a group assignment in that one class where everyone is losing steam, navigating tense workplace disagreements, handling delicate family matters, or simply engaging in social discourse, maintaining a diplomatic approach allows everyone to express their opinions and concerns.

It’s easy to constantly want to play the devil’s advocate and escalate situations until there’s one prevailing voice. It’s quicker and, at times, rather effective. This is the confluence where democracy and diplomacy feed off each other. While democracy thrives in open discourse and debate, diplomacy refines that discourse into actionable solutions, held accountable to all the parties it is meant and made to serve. But democracy, at its best, is not a battlefield where only one side triumphs. It is a dialogue, a negotiation, a careful balancing of interests. Without diplomacy, democracy risks becoming a vile screaming ground; without democracy, diplomacy risks losing its integrity.

If you still do not believe in the value of a diplomatic approach, here’s some big picture consequences to the contrary. The rise of political hyper-partisanship, polarization in the House of Representatives, and the abrasive erosion of civil discourse have led to a derisive and frighteningly unpredictable political climate where discourse is underscored by outright biased confrontation and personal attacks, both on social media and in real life. This unwillingness to compromise and engage in diplomatic practices has caused significant harm, creating an increasingly fractured society.

On an international scale, a shift away from diplomatic relationships towards aggressive and isolationist policies, where hyper-nationalistic tendencies are favored over patriotic duty, strains once great allyships. The Treaty of Versailles in 1919 that buckled down on punitive measures rather than reconciliation was a major cause of WW2, the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962 became a crisis due to the severe lack of diplomatic agreement that nearly ended in nuclear catastrophe, and the Cold War was prolonged due to the severe lack of open diplomatic channels. It should be noted that the Cold War only began to de-escalate with sustained negotiations like the Sustained Arms Reductions Treaties (START I and II).

Thus, I believe that now more than ever, it is an imperative to reinvest in the principles of diplomacy. On a personal level, practicing diplomacy in daily interactions can lead to stronger relationships, reduced conflicts, and a more cohesive society. It requires patience and empathy. It requires active participation of all involved parties. It requires you to wrack your brain, wring out ideas, and sometimes compromise your ego in order to get a job done and reach an agreement with your peers. But this is something tangibly achievable and necessary in order to create systemic changes in governance.

Diplomacy is not merely a tool for politicians and diplomats—it is a vital skill for everyone. In a world increasingly marked by division, the ability to bridge gaps and create solutions through constructive conversation is more important than ever.