SERVING THE ON-LINE RPI COMMUNITY SINCE 1994
SEARCH ARCHIVES
Current Issue: Volume 130, Number 1 July 14, 2009

Ed/Op


Staff Editorial
Calendar change not a hit

Posted 04-19-2009 at 10:32PM

Provost Robert Palazzo released a major change to the 2009–10 academic calendar Tuesday morning, which will lengthen the break between fall and spring semesters to five weeks. This longer break is proposed as a period for students to explore new study abroad experiences, pursue undergraduate research, or direct self-study programs, as described in Palazzo’s statement. While these opportunities may prove beneficial to students, the Polytechnic Editorial Board feels that the negatives associated with the change may outweigh the benefits.

By increasing the length of Winter Break, the spring semester is extended into the summer break. Next year, spring semester classes will end May 11 and Commencement is slated to be held May 29. We feel that by shifting the second semester, this change will actually hinder students looking for summer internships by decreasing the time available to work or conflicting with non-negotiable start dates. Also, the change will increase Rensselaer Union costs to fund sports, costs which will probably be passed down directly to the students.

Palazzo explained that this academic calendar was formulated by the Board of Trustees from a recommendation by President Shirley Ann Jackson “in consultation with the academic leadership of the university, to modify the academic calendar of Rensselaer to enable significant new prospects for curricular, co-curricular, and personal growth programming that is in keeping with the spirit and reality of The Rensselaer Plan.” We feel that, while this type of modification to the academic calendar may grant new opportunities, a series of negatives will cause students to lose out. The Editorial Board is only aware of a brief consultation with a small group of student leaders, which is not sufficient student input. Although the President of the Union is a member of the Calendar Committee, we wish that a broader group of opinions had been solicited. We hope that, in the future, such decisions will be made in a way that employs a greater student voice—perhaps by working with the Student Senate and various committees—to survey the extent to which a large-scale change such as this will affect students.



Posted 04-19-2009 at 10:32PM
Copyright 2000-2006 The Polytechnic
Comments, questions? E-mail the Webmaster. Site design by Jason Golieb.