SERVING THE ON-LINE RPI COMMUNITY SINCE 1994
SEARCH ARCHIVES
Current Issue: Volume 130, Number 1 July 14, 2009

Ed/Op


Staff Editorial
Mid-term grading still absent from courses

Posted 03-22-2007 at 3:04PM

The Spring 2007 semester is already halfway over, and with that mid-term milestone comes a great deal of responsibility—the majority of which is in the hands of professors. Last semester saw legislation passed making it mandatory for students to be given some sort of mid-term assessment, be it a letter grade or not, that would roughly indicate the student’s performance in relation to his or her classmates. However, the mid-term has come and gone with only a few faculty abiding by this new policy. How are students going to know how they are doing in a course?

For those of you unfamiliar with this policy, which was passed by the Student Senate Academic Affairs Committee along with the Faculty Senate Curriculum Committee, it requires that all students be given mid-term information by their professors. The method of assessment is left up to each instructor, so students may not receive something as clear-cut as a letter grade. Though this new policy was sent to all members of the faculty last semester, many have not incorporated it into their syllabi, and students are still unaware of their standings relative to the class as a whole. Some professors argue that students should already have a feel for the grade based on tests and homework. The problem, however, lies with courses in which graded assignments and evaluations are not handed back or courses with ongoing projects that are not fully graded until the semester’s end. If students are not given some means of feedback at mid-term, they could be unpleasantly surprised when grades are given after finals—and at that point, it becomes difficult to argue the grade given.

It may now be time for students to take a more active approach with making sure that this new policy is followed. For those courses without a mid-term assessment plan already set up, students should seek out the professors or teaching assistants and ask that an evaluation be given. The only long-standing system in place is the Early Warning System, but this only applies in cases where the student is on track to receive a D or F letter grade. All students, whether they are on track to get an A or an F, have the right to know not only how they are personally fairing in a course, but also how that relates to their classmates. This policy was drafted and passed for a reason, and students should not be content until they are given the assessment they deserve.



Posted 03-22-2007 at 3:04PM
Copyright 2000-2006 The Polytechnic
Comments, questions? E-mail the Webmaster. Site design by Jason Golieb.