 |
 |
 |
| SERVING THE ON-LINE RPI COMMUNITY SINCE 1994 |
 |
|
|
 |
| Current Issue: |
Volume 130, Number 1 |
July 14, 2009 |
Ed/Op

Derby E-Board’s task complete
Posted 02-16-2005 at 2:19PM
 Peter Baldwin President of the Union A draft of the activity fee packet was distributed to the Student Senate last Friday, marking the end of a year long process of review, analysis, and work completed by the Executive Board and Union staff. Allocating an $8.2 million dollar line item budget is quite an arduous task for any organization, yet year after year student leaders volunteer their time in order to ensure that student activities can not only function, but continue to advance the ideals for which Rensselaer and the Union stand. Each and every member of the E-Board deserves credit for the representation and review that went into each entity of the Union. The staff of the Union did an exemplary job as primary resources dealing with clubs on a daily basis and compiling data on each club in order to facilitate board decisions. They have put in countless hours of gathering numbers and assembling reports, and deserve equal credit for the end result.
This draft of the budget for the 2005/2006 Union activity fee is a reflection of a return to our purpose as a Union, with an emphasis on contribution of each program to the sense of community on campus. The undergraduate activity fee is proposed to increase 1.2 percent to $460 a year and the graduate activity fee is proposed to increase 2.1 percent to $244 a year. Over the past four years, the activity fee has increased on an average of five percent per year, and if one looks at the 10 year history of the activity fee, they would find that it has increased on average about eight percent the five years previous to that. This could lead one to the opinion that the Union may have costs that are not under strict control, and that the need-based budgeting approach taken by the E-Board may not be as effective a process for the budget. I would disagree and came into the year with a firm belief that need based budgeting was the only realistic way to budget for over one hundred clubs, each with their individual programs and goals. Experience on the board has proven to me that no formula or simple guideline can be applied to every club, and that the only way to budget responsibly and effectively is to compare every club against the same rubric, the Union mission. This singular direction ensures that each club has a common bond to unite us, the common bond that we call the Rensselaer Student Union. I believe this approach proved to be successful. The proposed increase for this year is the lowest in the 10 year history that I have available. It makes a statement of accountability from a financial standpoint while keeping within the realms of need based budgeting for student activities.
Funding for athletics is proposed to increase 7.1 percent with larger increases coming in men’s soccer (11.1 percent), women’s soccer (23.5 percent), football (13 percent), and men’s hockey (16.9 percent). This budget also includes the elevation of the women’s hockey team to Division I, but stands at a four percent increase due to a substantial contribution from the Office of the President. The board was able to fund nine new programs in the budget including Go Be Red, a student spirit initiative coming out of the Student Life Committee of the Senate. The budget is the most fundamental tool that we have as students in determining our extracurricular life, and this year’s budget proposal is an active reflection of the fulfillment of acting as the medium for which student opinion is to be expressed and the expansion of extracurricular life. | |
 Posted 02-16-2005 at 2:19PM |  |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
| Copyright 2000-2006 The Polytechnic |
| Comments, questions? E-mail the Webmaster. Site design by Jason Golieb. |
|
|
|